Last Friday, several political parties in Colombia expressed their disapproval of the "hate" speech and "confrontational" tone used by President Gustavo Petro on Labor Day, when presenting the 12 questions for the popular consultation. The political parties believe that the language used by Petro undermines democratic institutions in the country.
In their statements, the political parties openly criticized the use of language they consider divisive and which fosters confrontation, instead of promoting dialogue and unity in Colombian society. They expressed their concern about the polarization that such speeches generate among citizens and called on Petro to moderate his tone and messages in order to strengthen democracy in the country.
One of the most questioned aspects of Petro's speech was his aggressive tone towards sectors of Colombian society, which, according to critics, goes against the principles of respect and tolerance that should prevail in a democratic country. The words of the Colombian president have generated a debate in public opinion, dividing the population regarding the legitimacy of his communication style.
In this context, various political and social actors have called for reflection on the importance of promoting a political discourse based on respect and the construction of consensus, rather than resorting to confrontation and hatred. The controversy over Petro's words highlights the need to foster an environment of dialogue that allows addressing the challenges Colombia faces from a diversity of opinions and political positions.
